求雅思剑桥9的test1大作文范文的翻译

Childrens education has long been our concern since Plato once uttered, "Education is where a country should start at." However, it is still a controversial issue after all these years among people who are particularly concerned about it. Some people believe that it is parents responsibility to cultivate their kids to be fully aware of what a social being should look like; others, whereas, argue that schools should take over this for the ultimate goal. In this essay, I would put this issue in question and further analyse both sides before presenting my personal perspective.

On one hand, parents, as the first touchers of their kids, should tell them how to differentiate right from wrong. Given the time parents spend with their kids, they can be more likely to observe everyday change of their children. As a result of this, they are accountable for how their children normally behave in reality. More importantly, considering the fact that people according to their social being are usually placed into diverse norms, parents, as a family, as a part of community and as individuals in the society, should appropriately behave in action so as to deliver a message to their kids in which what should be respected and cherished in lives is highly highlighted.

On the other hand, academic institutions should take the responsibility for educating students to be entirely ready to enter the society. After leaving parents for schools, kids almost devote their most prime time at schools with their peels, their friends and their teachers; therefore, schools ought to put much emphasis on their growth as a person. Consequently, students could learn what they cannot acquire from home, such as communicative skills, understanding of various cultures etc.

求雅思剑桥9的test1大作文范文的翻译

Childrens education has long been our concern since Plato once uttered, "Education is where a country should start at." However, it is still a controversial issue after all these years among people who are particularly concerned about it. Some people believe that it is parents responsibility to cultivate their kids to be fully aware of what a social being should look like; others, whereas, argue that schools should take over this for the ultimate goal. In this essay, I would put this issue in question and further analyse both sides before presenting my personal perspective. On one hand, parents, as the first touchers of their kids, should tell them how to differentiate right from wrong. Given the time parents spend with their kids, they can be more likely to observe everyday change of their children. As a result of this, they are accountable for how their children normally behave in reality. More importantly, considering the fact that people according to their social being are usually placed into diverse norms, parents, as a family, as a part of community and as individuals in the society, should appropriately behave in action so as to deliver a message to their kids in which what should be respected and cherished in lives is highly highlighted. On the other hand, academic institutions should take the responsibility for educating students to be entirely ready to enter the society. After leaving parents for schools, kids almost devote their most prime time at schools with their peels, their friends and their teachers; therefore, schools ought to put much emphasis on their growth as a person. Consequently, students could learn what they cannot acquire from home, such as communicative skills, understanding of various cultures etc.。

推荐一本雅思写作范文书

慎小嶷除了《十天突破雅思写作》还有一个6-9分范文（书皮都差不多，只不过《十天写作》主色是绿的，6-9分范文主色是蓝的），里面全是范文和对应范文的解析，应该合你胃口~剑8的我看过，剑9不知道有没有。不过从作文的角度来讲剑8剑9差不了多少吧，作文题目分类就那么多~

另外还有一个《雅思8分万能作文》，范文也不少，特别推荐小作文。他的大作文写的感觉不是很主流（即没有固定的套路，很随性，看起来感觉水平很高的样子），可以说是比较有特点，行文方式基本各不相同，看你喜不喜欢了。

《雅思8分万能作文》的PDF我在太傻上下过，后来又买的纸质的就删了。。。慎小嶷的书买的纸质的~

剑桥雅思9里面的test4大作文,就是说现在很多语言在消失,有些人认

雅思作文任务完成度只占四分之一的成绩，而且一般而言你写啥观点都行，只要你能说通。所以正反都行，我习惯是写冷观点，和别人不一样，容易上分。不过具体看个人

我把我写作思路搬上来吧，你借鉴下

先说many people think this tendency will undermine the diversity of language seriously,yet I would state my objection to this issue after analyzing the following reasons.

第一段写the preservation of these rare language will waste plenty of funds which should be used in many other fields contributing to society.

然后写the disappearance of these language will remarkably benifit our daily communication.

第三段我喜欢先列反方观点然后反驳，some people may say the diversity of language is a sigificant part of our culture,however,the importance of it is especially exaggerated.

雅思写作主要还是语法单词架构，观点不能说不重要，但不必看的太重，真想不出来可以用网上的万能观点，联系经济社会教育等常见话题展开

剑桥雅思全真试题4 第一篇小作文范文

The table gives a breakdown of the different types of family who were living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

On average, 11% of all households, comprising almost two million people, were in this position. However, those consisting of only one parent or a single adult had almost double this proportion of poor people, with 21% and 19% respectively.

Couples generally tended to be better off, with lower poverty levels for couples without children (7%) than those with children (12%). It is noticeable that for both types of household with children, a higher than average proportion were living in poverty at this time.

older people were generally less likely to be poor, though once again the trend favoured elderly couples (only 4%) rather than single elderly people (6%).

Overall the table suggests that households of single asults and those with children were more likely to be living in poverty than those consisting of couples.

T0T是不是这个，，累死我了

求剑桥8雅思作文范文

《剑桥雅思8》Test1大作文范文 Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 分析：这道题是问儿童教育应该谁来负责，是家长还是学校。

Childrens education has long been our concern since Plato once uttered, "Education is where a country should start at." However, it is still a controversial issue after all these years among people who are particularly concerned about it. Some people believe that it is parents responsibility to cultivate their kids to be fully aware of what a social being should look like; others, whereas, argue that schools should take over this for the ultimate goal. In this essay, I would put this issue in question and further analyse both sides before presenting my personal perspective. On one hand, parents, as the first touchers of their kids, should tell them how to differentiate right from wrong. Given the time parents spend with their kids, they can be more likely to observe everyday change of their children. As a result of this, they are accountable for how their children normally behave in reality. More importantly, considering the fact that people according to their social being are usually placed into diverse norms, parents, as a family, as a part of community and as individuals in the society, should appropriately behave in action so as to deliver a message to their kids in which what should be respected and cherished in lives is highly highlighted. On the other hand, academic institutions should take the responsibility for educating students to be entirely ready to enter the society. After leaving parents for schools, kids almost devote their most prime time at schools with their peels, their friends and their teachers; therefore, schools ought to put much emphasis on their growth as a person. Consequently, students could learn what they cannot acquire from home, such as communicative skills, understanding of various cultures etc. From what was previously well stated, my point of view can be generated that parental education should be highly cooperated with formal education in the process of a childs growth. What contribute to a person to become an entity are interpersonal skills and intrapersonal qualities; however, as for the parental education and formal education, the ultimate goal of a person which is to be taught to be a proper member of society cannot be fulfilled without either one of these.。

求一篇雅思满分作文 要求如下：题目里要有表格,且表格中的数据要有

范文：

The table compares the opinions of male and female club members about the services provided by a city sports club.

We can see from the responses that the male members are generally happy or satisfied with the range of activities at the club, with only 5% dissatisfied. In contrast, however, only about two-thirds of female members were positive about the activity range and almost a third were dissatisfied. The genders were more in agreement about the club facilities. only 14% of women and 10% of men were unhappy with these, and the majority (64 and 63% respectively) were very positive. Finally, the female respondents were much happier with the club opening hours than their male counterparts. Almost three-quarters of them were very satisfied with these and only 3% were unhappy, whereas nearly 40% of the men expressed their dissatisfaction.

Overall, the table indicates that female members are most unhappy with the range of activities, while male members feel that opening hours are the least satisfactory aspect of the club.

如何才能写出这样的雅思9分作文

语文教育家叶圣陶说，作文就是说话。

其中有两层意思：其一，要有话说；其二，话要好好说。这儿只谈谈后者。

如何说话才算好呢？能激活读者大脑的话便是好话。如何激活读者的大脑呢？回答这个问题之前，我们有必要想想读者的大脑究竟喜欢什么、需要什么。

即是说，我们首先要研究读者语言解读背后的生命状态。笔者以为读者的生命状态主要体现在四方面，简述如下：其一，大脑机能自主化。

心理学中信息加工理论告诉我们，人的大脑及感官的运行流程分三步：接受刺激、进行加工、传导兴奋。因此，大脑工作的状态是积极的、自主化的。

如果输入大脑的信息简单或陈旧，大脑便很难获得自主加工的快感，甚至陷入疲惫。看一遍《天鹅湖》，大脑获得快感，但看三百遍，大脑便只能进入消极的抑制状态。

因此，好的语言总是留给大脑自主加工的空间。《红楼梦》（48回）中香菱说“日落江湖白，潮来天地青”（王维诗），“白”“青”两字“念在嘴里倒像有几千斤重的一个橄榄”，可见这两字所留下的加工空间！“这个女孩长得一点不漂亮”自然就不如“这个女孩长得一点不沉鱼落雁、闭月羞花”。

因为后者需要大脑对“沉鱼落雁、闭月羞花”进行加工才能获得“不漂亮”这一信息。而这一加工过程给了大脑快感，因为满足了大脑“机能自主化原则”。

“峨嵋山月半轮秋”较“峨嵋山秋月半轮”有诗意，也正在于语序的倒错而使大脑有了自主加工的快感。其二，信息刺激陌生化。

这是“大脑机能自主化”的延伸。陌生的信息输入大脑，大脑进行的“自主化”加工就更富有挑战性，自然也就更易获得快感。

因此，我们的文字应给读者大脑输入新鲜信息，第一个以花喻女儿的，是天才，第二个则是庸才，第三个只是蠢才；诗词中同是说“山”，便有“青山”“碧峰”“翠峦”“黛岫”……诸语，说“夕阳”，便有“落日”“晚照”“夕照”“夕曛”“斜阳”“余晖”“残照”“残阳”……诸语，这并非骚人墨客游戏文字，而是自发地运用了“信息刺激陌生化”这一原则。其三，思维模式立体化。

中国人的思维不同于西方人，西方人长于流线型的逻辑思维，而中国人更喜欢立体化的形象思维。《周易.系辞上》中有这样一句话：“书不尽言，言不尽意……圣人立象以尽意。”

“立象以尽意”正是我国浩瀚诗文基本的“立体化”思维模式的最好概括。诗言志，而志不直言，巧借“象”言之。

马致远想说羁旅之苦，便列举“枯藤”“老树”“昏鸦”“小桥”“流水”“人家”“古道”“西风”“瘦马”等象助其言之；读者借助“断肠人在天涯”一句的提示，去感受这些象，自然心有戚戚，感同身受了。文载道，而道不直说，常借比喻或寓言言之。

诸子百家文，无不如此。一部《庄子》，寓言（含喻）就占十之八九。

先秦而下，《诗经》，汉赋，唐宋华章……《围城》……亦无不如此。又如“鹰鼻”的表现力自然强于“勾鼻”，“鹅卵石”也强过“垒石”。

“春风又绿江南岸”中，一个“绿”字，以形象的“色”激活大脑，使满脑里皆是光鲜春色，又恍若眼前，尽得风流；而将“到”“满”……易“绿”字，大脑便只能知道江南皆春而无余韵，正如囫囵吞枣，知枣而无枣味，因为思维没有获得“立体化”的满足。其四，认知选择情感化。

个人在物质的及社会的环境里，选择对象形成认知。在认知过程中，个人重视的首先是符合其欲望、情绪的对象。

因此，读者更愿意接受情感化的主观性语言。“绿色的邮筒孤独地站在街的对面”的表现力自然强于“绿色的邮筒立在街的对面”。

“云破月来花弄影”中，“弄”较“摇”好，原因在着一“弄”字，花不复花，影不复影，花影皆性情中人也。当然，这四方面并不是割裂分立的，相反，它们是浑沌的、整体的、综合的，相互包容而化为一种生命状态。

我们的文字正需要“迎合”读者的这一生命状态。如何“迎合”呢？作者应具有同读者一样的生命状态！写作与阅读不就是两种生命状态的交流、碰撞、沟通吗？而作品不就是这两种生命状态相遇的“场”吗？也就是说，作者只有激活自己的生命状态，并在这种状态下创作出作品，这作品才能去激活读者的生命状态。

为此，笔者提出这样的语言传达总则：有话不直说，换个说法说。“话不直说”，读者的大脑便有了“自主化”加工的机会；“变个说法”，读者的大脑便获得了“陌生化”“立体化”“情感化”的信息。

这样，读者的生命状态便被激活了，从而获得语言的阅读快感。从前文所举例，不难理解这一传达总则。

这一总则下，笔者又演绎出六项技术：其一，联比。联比便是“立象尽意”的怪常之法。

作者有话要说，但不单调直说，而是借助联想和想象以相似、相类或相关甚至相反的事物或情景作比，使道理和形象相得益彰，从而使自己的话变得有趣、易懂、形象。具体而言，包括比喻、对比、类比、映衬等手法。

欲说女儿腰如何纤细如何婀娜，蠢才直言腰围几何，天才则联比为“杨柳腰”“水蛇腰”之类。再看下面两个句子：1. 20世纪快要过去了，处于世纪之交的我们回首百年往事……2. 20世纪的帷幕正在我们头顶徐徐落下，站在20世纪与21世纪之交的驿站，。