tpo40综合写作范文

托福综合写作求批改tpo49

The reading and listening passages are having conflicting opinions about whether humpback whales navigate by the stars. The writer presents three theroies to explain the phenomenon. However, according to the listening, none of the theories showed in the reading is convincing.First of all, the reading claims that humpback whales are intelligent enough to use stars for navigation. The whalewell-developed cognitive ability seems to provide a sound basis for the ability to use stars for their orientation. But the opposes that there is not necessarily any real connection between ability of anminals to use stars for navigation and their intelligence. To illustrate, the professor takes docks as an example. Docks are not highly intelligent, so theirability to navigate with star does not seem to have much of the connection to their overall intelligence, but the instinct. Accordingly,humpback whales intelligence does not make them particularly likely to use stars for navigation.Second, the writer holds the opinion that humpback whales rely on stars at night to provide them withexternal signs by which to keep streight direction over long distance. But the professor in the lecture refutes this viewpoint bysaying that there may be a different explanation for the humpback whales ability to move in straight lines. For animals able to navigate in straight lines, they must depend on some external object or force, which is Earths magnetic field. It is because a substance called bio-magnetite exists in whales brains and ususally the animals with the substance in their brain are sensitive to the earth magnetic field. The presence of bio-magnetite proves they orient themselves by the magnetic field, rather than stars.Finally, the writer states that humpback whales would float straight up for minutes at a time, known as sky-hopping,which indicates they are looking at stars when navigating. On the contrary, the listening rebuts this point. The professorsays that spy-hopping probably has nothing to do with looking at stars. For example, other animals, like sharks,sky-hop. But their sky-hopping is just in order to hunt for preys. In addition, humpback whales are observed sky-hoppingduring the daytime when no stars can be seen. Thus, the hypothesis that the function of spy-hopping is to look at starscannot hold water and is pure speculation.。

托福写作范文照抄会被扣分吗？

不建议盲目搜索范文。

网上流传的各种“托福写作范文”来源并不明确，范文质量没有保证，盲目模仿或照抄而来的作文未必是一篇高质量作文。照抄范文会造成不同考生作文中出现雷同语句的情况，在作文评分时的机器“查重”这一关评价会很低。所以，模仿或照抄范文写托福作文，很难得到理想分数。

想要提高托福写作成绩，最权威的官方范文请参考托福考试机构 ETS 出版的托福官方指南（official guide，简称OG）,OG 上明确了托福写作的评分要求和应对策略，并且给出了独立写作和综合写作各个分数段的范文和考官评价。OG 比其它写作教材更有针对性，也更具权威性。

另外，范文的意义在于参考，想要获得理想的托福作文分数，不能仅仅依靠背诵或套用范文。准备托福写作，重点是要看考试的评分要求，并且对照自己的情况，做针对性的能力训练。

可以按照以下步骤进行：

1. 熟读 OG 上关于写作的评分要求，认真研读官方的满分范文。

2. 做一套 TPO 写作题目（包括独立写作和综合写作），找到自己的作文和满分作文的差距。

3. 根据内容、结构、语言三个方面的能力强弱，制定一个有针对性的训练计划。

比如，内容方面需要观察生活、积累作文素材；结构方面得研究议论文的写作框架；语言方面要多学习别人地道的表达。如果是听力或者阅读问题，导致综合写作不好，则要强化听力和阅读。

4. 做阶段性的能力测试（比如每周做一套 TPO），实时掌握自己的能力提高情况，并对计划作出调整。

托福40分高中毕业裸考能达到吗？

通过TPO自测，你基本对托福考试的4个考试科目有个基本的了解，而且你的听力、阅读都能取得挺不错的成绩，可以继续做题练习保持。口语和作文是输出项目，所以对于很多考生来讲都不容易，需要更加熟悉考试的题型和应试技巧才能更好地提高分数。

如果你感觉很难开口进行口语交流，有必要进行一定的口语训练了，最好能有老师进行指导，因为涉及很多答题的要点和方法，观点等；当然也需要自己多练习，多模拟。

作文分综合写作和独立写作部分，综合写作会考察学生阅读和听力的技能，并要求学生能进行归纳表达，最好能多研究范文；独立写作则需要坚持动笔练习，提炼观点和论证方法，积累套句，最好能找专业老师修改，则会进步更快。

托福综合写作~

楼主你太强悍了，那么短的时间能写出470个字，反正我是写得很慢了，撑死不会超过450。

还有你听力也很强，能够都记录下来。这样挺好，听力和电脑给出的那段文章同样重要，在你写的时候必须都要者都要反映出来才行，当然，只要说得通，有道理，你偏向哪一个观点也是可以的。

也就是说，你可以重点支持你所听到的内容，但是一定要结合电脑给的阅读，不然你写的时候就只是在陈述自己的看法，而不是根据文章的内容来的。字数要求其实不是那么严，多写也没有啥不好，主要还是看语言流畅不，句子组织、词汇等、还有没有反映出听力和给定文章的内容。

有没有人可以讲解一下Tpo2的综合写作……

ETS推出的TPO系列是各位考生在备战新托福考试时非常重要的资料之一，下面是新托福名师推荐的TPO综合写作中的满分范文，希望能帮助许多刚刚接触新托福的朋友们了解和熟悉综合写作的方式和套路，拿到新托福综合写作的高分。

新托福考试TPO2综合写作高分范文（ETS 满分版）： The lecturer talks about research conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened in reality. First, some members got free rides. That is, some didnt work hard but got recognition for the success nontheless. This also indicates that people who worked hard were not given recognition they should have gotten. In other words, they werent given the opportunity to “shine”. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates. Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that groups are more responsive than individuals because of the number of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were slower than individuals in decision making. Groups needed more time for meetings, which are necessary procedures in decision making. This was another place where experience contradicted theory. Third, influential people might emerge and lead the group towards glory or failure. If the influent people are going in the right direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go in the wrong direction, there is nobody that has enough influence to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the leader, and might become less flexible in its thinking. They might become one-sided, and thus fail to succeed. Rating annotation: once you can read past what seem to be the results of poor typing, this Benchmark 5 does an excellent job of presenting the points about the contribution and recognition of group members as well as about speed of group decisions. The final paragraph contains one noticeable error (“influent”), which is then used correctly two sentences later (“influential”). Overall, this is a successful response and scored within (though perhaps not at the top of) the 5 level.。