哪里有剑桥雅思考官范文

剑1到剑8都是剑桥出的官方复习参考资料，都是一段时间考过的真题，挑选出来出的一本书，最后还有部分考官的写作范文。

1-4不是很清楚，5是2006年，6是2007年，7是2009年，8是2011年。剑8肯定不可能是中国人出的，没这实力，剑8是最贴近最近出题趋势的，但是事事无绝对，只是用于参考。

补充回答第一个问题，两者区别在哪里我不是很清楚，都是解析真题的，还是很有用的，尤其是对于阅读，他能很清楚的告诉你每道题的答案是怎么出来的，这样比较容易搞懂，在家自己就能多多训练，不然对好答案，也不知道错在哪里，应该怎么做。

哪里有剑桥雅思考官范文

剑1到剑8都是剑桥出的官方复习参考资料，都是一段时间考过的真题，挑选出来出的一本书，最后还有部分考官的写作范文。

1-4不是很清楚，5是2006年，6是2007年，7是2009年，8是2011年。剑8肯定不可能是中国人出的，没这实力，剑8是最贴近最近出题趋势的，但是事事无绝对，只是用于参考。

补充回答第一个问题，两者区别在哪里我不是很清楚，都是解析真题的，还是很有用的，尤其是对于阅读，他能很清楚的告诉你每道题的答案是怎么出来的，这样比较容易搞懂，在家自己就能多多训练，不然对好答案，也不知道错在哪里，应该怎么做。

剑桥雅思全真试题4 第一篇小作文范文

The table gives a breakdown of the different types of family who were living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

On average, 11% of all households, comprising almost two million people, were in this position. However, those consisting of only one parent or a single adult had almost double this proportion of poor people, with 21% and 19% respectively.

Couples generally tended to be better off, with lower poverty levels for couples without children (7%) than those with children (12%). It is noticeable that for both types of household with children, a higher than average proportion were living in poverty at this time.

older people were generally less likely to be poor, though once again the trend favoured elderly couples (only 4%) rather than single elderly people (6%).

Overall the table suggests that households of single asults and those with children were more likely to be living in poverty than those consisting of couples.

T0T是不是这个，，累死我了

求剑桥8雅思作文范文

《剑桥雅思8》Test1大作文范文 Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 分析：这道题是问儿童教育应该谁来负责，是家长还是学校。

Children's education has long been our concern since Plato once uttered, "Education is where a country should start at." However, it is still a controversial issue after all these years among people who are particularly concerned about it. Some people believe that it is parents' responsibility to cultivate their kids to be fully aware of what a social being should look like; others, whereas, argue that schools should take over this for the ultimate goal. In this essay, I would put this issue in question and further analyse both sides before presenting my personal perspective. On one hand, parents, as the first touchers of their kids, should tell them how to differentiate right from wrong. Given the time parents spend with their kids, they can be more likely to observe everyday change of their children. As a result of this, they are accountable for how their children normally behave in reality. More importantly, considering the fact that people according to their social being are usually placed into diverse norms, parents, as a family, as a part of community and as individuals in the society, should appropriately behave in action so as to deliver a message to their kids in which what should be respected and cherished in lives is highly highlighted. On the other hand, academic institutions should take the responsibility for educating students to be entirely ready to enter the society. After leaving parents for schools, kids almost devote their most prime time at schools with their peels, their friends and their teachers; therefore, schools ought to put much emphasis on their growth as a person. Consequently, students could learn what they cannot acquire from home, such as communicative skills, understanding of various cultures etc. From what was previously well stated, my point of view can be generated that parental education should be highly cooperated with formal education in the process of a child's growth. What contribute to a person to become an entity are interpersonal skills and intrapersonal qualities; however, as for the parental education and formal education, the ultimate goal of a person which is to be taught to be a proper member of society cannot be fulfilled without either one of these.。