2015年11月03日雅思小作文题目和范文

（源自洛阳大华雅思题库）Some people believe that many people who work for creative arts such as painting, theatre and music should be supported financially by government. Others think that artists in creative arts should be supported by other sources instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.IntroductionVisual and auditory arts play a key role in education and entertainment, making these fields integral aspects of our society among all ages. Nevertheless, there is a controversial division about whether these areas ought to receive, or if they are even deserving of, any public funds.BodyThe arts form an intrinsic part of a country and have an ability to maintain traditional culture, as long as it is prevented from being absorbed by modern or foreign influences. As a result, government should invest funds into these historical types of art in order to educate its citizens and preserve their existence. There are ancient paintings, theatrical arts and musical instruments that ought to be housed and conserved in museums. The destruction of these precious pieces of art could signify a considerable loss of culture, whereby future generations will miss out on them.Artists and their outputs ought to adhere to the economic principles of supply and demand, whereby the necessity for their work is dictated by the need from society. Nevertheless, there are artists, dramatists and musicians who are relatively wealthy and do not require subsides from government to survive. As society evolves, perhaps certain genres of art are not needed anymore and it would be economically unfeasible to keep them afloat using taxpayer dollars. Instead, programs that have immediate impacts on the lives of citizens must be focused on, including education, healthcare and social services.ConclusionFrom my perspective, only art forms that are deemed nationally significant ought to receive government funding. In this way, it would be fair for a host of other industries who cannot easily obtain financial assistance.。

14年10月18日雅思大作文,求评分及理由,

我觉得首段和尾段观点很清晰，每段句首的中心句的使用也不错，+论证：第二段，一般，表达上其实没什么问题，但是你只不过分项说了不同渠道可以给提供信息，其实还不如整合了一起讲，然后谈谈是哪些信息.如：There is no doubt that much can be learned about various cultures from books,TV programs and websites nowadays that provide detailed information about local customs,architectures,food,arts and sports .第三段中心句的表达应做一些变化了，而不是一直重复books,films,internet.（这跟第二段几乎一样）.论证上虽然算有层次，但感觉力度一般，而且次序可以调整一下以体现力度.比如直接接触和交流再加上实地观察可以放第一个比详论之，之后再论其他点.如：However,the second-hand experience obtained from reading books or watching TV can never be the same as what one sees and experiences in person..由于时间关系无法展开太多.不过看得出来你的英语功底是在的，语法及拼写错误算挺少的.在有限的时间里能写到以上的那些点也已经不错了.综上，我预测你的写作分数不出意外的话会是：6-6.5，如果大方点可看到7，严厉点的话5.5也是有可能.不过5.5的话，可能问题是在于你的词汇量的点缀不够漂亮（因为高频句型你用得很明显）以及论证地不够力度.不过考官审稿的时间也不长，除非非常老练否则也不见得那么仔细.所以预计是6-6.5最后.。

谁有2019年2月14日雅思大作文真题参考范文？求解

2019年2月14日雅思大作文题目新技术改变了孩子们的玩耍方式，这是好还是坏？New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages？解析&审题本题中有三个关键词，即new technologies,children,spend their free time，要求讨论“新技术改变了孩子们玩耍的方式，这是好还是坏？”在构思本题的时候，我们首先需要说清楚的是：哪些新技术？怎么样改变了孩子们玩耍的方式？然后讨论这种改变是好还是坏。

当然，我们也要提醒自己，本题的重点是讨论“这种改变是好还是坏？”说到“新技术”，我们立马会想到电脑，网络，智能手机。雅思考试写作经常要求考生讨论这样的题目“有了新技术，人们是否还需要去博物馆，去上学，去图书馆，去公司上班”，这是要求考生讨论新技术给人们的学习和生活带来的影响。

本题其实与这些题目是异曲同工的：有了新技术，孩子们怎么玩耍？那么，新技术如何改变孩子们玩耍的方式呢？我们需要提炼出2-3个“玩耍新方式”，在接下来重点讨论起优劣势的时候才能有基础。这里其实涉及到一个比较的问题。

没有新技术的时候，孩子们一般喜欢在一起做各种游戏，或者安静地阅读，而网络手机的广泛使用，则让孩子们整天独自打电子游戏，或者浏览各种社交媒体信息。于是，我们可以归纳出新技术给孩子玩耍方式造成的两个影响：（1）从真实的集体游戏转变为虚拟的网上游戏；（2）从阅读书籍到紧盯手机或电脑。

这样，我们接下来的讨论就相对容易了。我们可以讨论这种变化的消极影响：首先，紧盯手机和电脑会给孩子的身体带来不良影响（数据表明，中小学生近视的比例已经达到惊人的70%），其次，过多沉浸在虚拟世界容易让孩子们产生孤独感，失去解决真实世界中各种问题的能力（比如人际交往能力，领导能力等）。

这样写，大家是否觉得思路是很清晰的？接下来，请大家阅读唐老师的高分范文，看以上思路是如何具体反映到字里行间的。老师笔记01The widespread use of new technologies such as the Internet,computers,and smart phones has fundamentally changed the way children spend their free time.In the past,most children wouldengage in outdoor activities such as hiking,playing hide-and-seek,flying kites,to name only a few.Those who enjoyed reading for pleasure would stay indoors and read print books such as classical novels,children's stories,and comic books.The situation is quite different now.The great majority of children today spend their spare time online,playing video games,listening to music,and browsing around in the social media of all kinds.In my view,this new development has more downside risks.互联网、电脑和智能手机等新技术的广泛应用，从根本上改变了儿童利用空闲时间的方式。

在过去，大多数儿童都会从事户外活动，如远足，玩捉迷藏，放风筝，等等。那些喜欢读书的人会待在家里，读一些印刷书籍，如经典小说，儿童故事和漫画书。

现在情况完全不同了。今天，绝大多数孩子都把业余时间花在网上，玩电子游戏，听音乐，在各种社交媒体上闲逛。

在我看来，这一新趋势有更多不利的风险。解析（1）本段讨论新技术如何改变了儿童利用空闲时间的方式。

本段采用的是比较法：过去。

，而现在。

。（2）widespread广泛的（3）fundamentally从根本上地（4）engage in从事（5）to name only a few仅举几个例子；诸如此类；等等（6）the great majority of。

绝大多数的。

（7）browse around四处闲看（8）downside risks不利的风险02Though it does make children's life more interesting,and help them obtain information in a faster and more convenient way,the Internet also makes children easily addicted to it.The violent gun-fighting games,for example,appeal to children so much that some of them will spend hours and hours playing them.The cost is really high.The children's performance at school becomes worse and worse,and their health also suffers.A recent study indicates that globally,the Internet games are responsible for 70%middle school students who are shortsighted.虽然互联网确实使儿童的生活更有趣，并帮助他们以更快和更方便的方式获取信息，但互联网也使孩子们很容易对它上瘾。比如暴力枪战游戏对孩子们有很大的吸引力，以至于他们中的一些人会几个小时几个小时地玩这些游戏。

这样做的成本真的很高。孩子们在学校的表现越来越差，而且健康也受到损害。

最近的一项研究表明，在全球范围内，网络游戏造成70%的中学生近视。解析（1）本段论述把时间花在网络游戏上的第一种坏处：学习和身体受损。

论述方法包括举例和引用研究数据。（2）be addicted to。

沉迷于。

（3）appeal to。吸引（4）globally全球范围内（5）be responsible for。

为。

负责；导致。

03Worse still,too much time spent facing the computer or smart phone may result in children's isolation from the actual world.In the traditional games,children could learn 。

谁能告诉我雅思10月大小作文都考什么了？

A类写作小作文两个line charts,line charts比bar和pie都要难一些，因为需要你提炼的内容更多，需要你找到重点。大作文是社会类，一道新题：Some countries have introduced a law to limit working hours for employees. Why this law can be introduced? Do you think its a positive or negative development？ 一个法律的讨论，关于工作时间的。这里借用ISABELLA_L的几条已经总结出的论据：

--保护劳动者利益 protect the rights and benefits of labourers

许多劳动者加班得不到应有的报酬，利益受到严重损害。

--减小工作强度 to reduce working strength

胡编个数字：据北京XX机构2009年的调查显示：74%的中国城市劳动者处于亚健康状态，超过半数的人经常被迫加班。这对于劳动者的身心均有损害。

--给人们更多的自由时间 free/entertainment/rest

--减少疲劳作业，提高工作效率 improve working efficency

--改善雇主与雇员关系 smooth the relationship between employer and employee

前四条都可以说得过去，第五条也凑合能当个支持。

G类大作文也出了新题，题目是Shopping is becoming a way of entertainment. Do you think it's a positive or negative development？ 还是比较有意思的，很容易正反两边摆开谈。具体论据这里就不一一陈述了。

雅思2009年10月24日大作文例文 200字左右

In present-day society, plastic containers and utensils are extensively used in big cities and the countryside alike. They are so common-place and I would hazard the guess that each one of us has seen, at one time or another, the unsightly scene of plastic bags swirling in the wind. These plastic shopping bags, chopsticks, to-go boxes and mineral-water bottles, to name but a few, when not properly disposed of, create a colossal amount of non-biodegradable refuse. Therefore, some people argue that we have embarked upon a “throw-away” era when plastic rubbish is largely dumped indiscriminately and irresponsibly (this act is often labeled “white pollution” on account of the color of plastic wastes). Personally, I wholeheartedly support their view. There are numerous reasons for this worrisome phenomenon coming into being. To begin with, at present the bulk of people who shop and/or eat out regularly are still poorly-informed, uninformed or misinformed about the pernicious influence that non-biodegradable pollutants exert on the ecosystem, which is the main culprit in the global-scale mishandling of the plastic wastes. The chief component of such trash is polythene, which cannot decompose on landfill sites over the process of the next hundreds of years if no major scientific breakthrough comes along in polythene treatment. Thus, such trash must be dealt with collectively rather than be scattered like tumbleweeds. Secondly, the proliferation of plastic shopping bags and eating ware is largely fuelled by the surging, headlong consumerism. Plastic containers and utensils are lighter in weight, cheaper (often free of charge) in price and water-proof in performance. These superior properties make them preferable to their paper and cloth counterparts in customers' eyes; and as consumer satisfaction reigns supreme in contemporary society, compared with superb portability, affordability and utility, how to dispose of them is the last thing the customers are concerned about. Additionally, plastic bags, wrap and containers are also commercially feasible since they are cheaper to manufacture, ship and store. These mercenary considerations also have prompted the good old cloth or paper bags to be supplanted by plastic bags but over the phasing-out process, few stores and restaurants advocate or encourage the use of environmentally-benign disposal of plastic trash, hence the whole slew of non-biodegradable garbage and environmental hazards ensue. Given the scale and severity of “white pollution”, we must take immediate steps to address this scourge. In the first place, we must do our utmost to enhance people's awareness of how persistent and devastating non-biodegradable trash can be to our environment and our posterity's. Secondly, retail stores and dining establishments should spare no effort in encouraging their customers to reuse plastic packing items. Furthermore, indiscriminate and irresponsible dumping of household garbage or personal junk should be outlawed by the legislature and heavy fines or even jail terms must be imposed on those compulsive litterbugs who fail to get their act together. Then, on the part of the biochemical researchers and technologists, scientific research must be launched here and now in pursuit of effectual ways to convert non-biodegradable refuse to biodegradable refuse. Last but not least, the government must not shirk its obligations in mobilizing scientific resources and rallying popular support in the crusade against “white pollution”. Neither should pay just lip service to relevant research and campaigns if no enough funding can be obtained otherwise. Additionally, I am convinced a customer tax levied by the government on the use of plastic bags will also help to curb this massive “white pollution”. The havoc non-biodegradable refuse can wreak on the ecosystem is beyond our imagination. It can eventually devastate soil, water and the aquatic and terrestrial biota. We must start combating this environmental catastrophe before the ecosystem irretrievably breaks down under the reign of the minute plastic debris.。