侃哥托福范文

求一篇托福范文

这是戴云教主修改的一篇范文，希望对你有帮助！People should not pay for the public transportation. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons or examples or support your ideas. There are all kinds (of ways 去掉) of public transportation all over the world, which play (the) (an)important role in people's daily lives. Although nearly （这里用almost或者nearly都可以，共同点1：两者均可表示“几乎”、“差不多”，有时可换用：但有时almost比nearly表示更接近的程度，用于 any 以及 no, none, nobody, nothing, never 等否定词前，可用almost，但不能用 nearly, nearly 前可用 very, pretty, not 等词修饰，但 almost 之前不能用这些词：）everybody in different countries needs to use the public transportation, people's attitudes towards it are entirely different. Some people insist that people should pay nothing for their using (usage) of the public transportation. (pay nothing = free of charge) Meanwhile, those who are strongly opposed to it （这个用法你使用的很好， be opposed to something） cite that people should pay for it if they want to take the advantage of the convenience （有take the convenience of something 的用法么？我没有找到，你如果有这方面的例子，可以告诉我） of the public transportation. From my own perspective, the latter one is more favorable even though I myself am one of the persons who need to spend money when take the public transportation. The first reason I want to put forward to support the cause of paying (cause 一般指不好的事情，比如说事故的起因，在这里用有点不合适，这一句话这么说是可以的，但是有点绕，可以直接说 The first reason I use to support my statement) is that any government needs enough money to build up and perfect infrastructures including the public transportation which are of great benefit to the entire people in one country. And where do governments get the money for constructions? People who have some basic common sense should know that it is (from) the pockets of all the citizens where governments get money. Here someone who opposes to （这里用be opposed to doing/something 或者是 oppose something/doing sthing，但是没有oppose to do something这个用法的） pay money will probably jump out to claim that now that governments levy taxes they should not ask people for money when they use the public transportation. I will give my point view （观点是point of view）which is directed against this statement. My opinion is that to build up perfect public transportation nets involving subways,buses and any other traffic transportations or auxiliary installations needs huge public tax subsidies. If all the people use the public transportation for free, it will mean that governments will spend much more money to support the operation of the public transportation. Maybe there won't be enough money to carry on new constructions. The financial burden of governments resulting from free public transportation might vastly increase and reach the point where they （这里指代有点不明）cannot stand. If we also think over the large amount of fuels used by traffic transportations and the salaries paid to staffs who work to operate the public transportations, I think everyone can reach the conclusion that if one country isn't so rich that all the people can enjoy high welfare in every area of daily lives（是否可以表达成 if one country is not rich enough to guaranty that all the citizens are covered with the high welfare in every aspects of their daily lives）, maybe it's unavoidable to pay when using the public transportation (the payment for using the public transportation is almost unavoidable). 你可以看一下那个表达方式更好Another important reason (which) cannot be ignored is that the number of passengers will undoubtedly increase rapidly just like traveling by skyrocket （这里可以说 will undoubtedly be skyrocket/skyrocketing就可以表达你想说的意思了）in case of the totally free public transportation. As we know, public transportation plays an irreplaceable role in people's daily social life. Particularly in some metropolis like New York, London and Beijing, there is an amazing flow volume of passenger using public transportation everyday. Just imagine the rapidly growing population taking public transportation instead of private vehicles or walking in case that the tickets are free. And the traffic system is likely to be disordered. Can you imagine the picture that hundreds of thousands of people crowd (are crowding，因为你的picture描述的是一个进行中的状态，所以用进行时更好，而且要注意并列成分的关系) in subways, or hectometers of long lines in airports are waiting for check in? Beijing' subways can be taken as a typic。

托福独立写作求范文

下面是小马过河为同学们搜集整理的关于托福独立写作满分范文：technology，供同学们参考。

Does technology make children less creative than in the past?

Are our kids becoming lazier and less creative, less imaginable than before as a consequence of highly advanced technology? My answer is no, and just the opposite, technology has apparently assisted our kids to become more creative.

First and foremost, technology has provided children with easy access to scientific and liberal art resources which is their best source of inspiration. For example, children could now easily gain access to academic databases through iPad screen, read classical works on Kindle, or watch historic documents on Internet. These great works are essentially helpful to arousing their curiosity and prepares them with key knowledge necessary for any creation. However, these wonderful equipments and facilities are never as handy in the past, when kids could only reach limited resources in public libraries or schools. In this sense, technology has provided the possibility for children to be more creative.

更多托福范文可以到小马过河托福写作专区查看 http://toefl.xiaoma.com/tuofuxiezuo/

托福tpo作文有范文吗

Independent Writing Topic

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

1. 题目翻译

你是否同意以下观点：如今教育孩子比之前更难了，因为他们花太多时间在手机、网络游戏还有社交网站上。

2. 审题关键词

Educating children; Cell phone; online games; Social networking Web site

3. 论证分析

正：

a) Children are easily midguided by the unhealthy information on the Internet and once they have absorbed it into their own values, it would be hard to educate them and change their mind.

b) Children are busy with the cell phone, online games and social networking website that they tend to spare no patience and attention to listen to their teachers or parents for any instruction.

c) People with whom children met, chatted and played via these three channels exerted great influences on them, which could be negative. However, as children spent so much time with these people and trusted them, they might resist the advices given by their teachers and parents.

反：

a) Teachers and parents could take advantage of these three things to get close to the children and be their friends so that in fact it is easier to educate them with variours channels.

b) For parents particularly, they could make it a bonus for children to use the cell phones, play games and chat on the social networking Web site when they do some housework, complete their homework or get high scores in a test. In this way, children may get a positive stimulus to do right things and parents educate them during the process.

求app小站托福tpo里的作文,口语范文

Nowadays advertisments can be seen everywhere:in pubs and buses,in newspapers and magazines,on TV screens and play grounds.It's more and more difficult for you to resist the attraction ofcolourful advertisements.There is a great deal to be said in favour of advertising.First,it provides information.The customer is told what is available on the market and how one product differs from another.Secondly,a wide range of activities and institutions receive financial support we would have to pay much more for newspapers and sports games。