1.求一份英文辩论赛四辩总结陈词.急用

I think we shouldn't make the market-oriented.Study depends on oneself.To find a job,it's not enough just to attend the college education,you should have a strong basic of knowledge.And then,choose what you are interested in to get some qualification.That will be competitive.The college education is just a one-side-fits-all education,your future improvement just depends on yourself.这是 我自己的想法，不知道合不合适呢？。

2.求英文辩论赛总结陈词~~~~谢谢

Some people hold that the newspaper is bound to be media of the past. To start with, time plays the most important role.As is shown, what has been in the newspaper is outdated. That is to say, if we want to approach the latest news, newspaper is simply not a good way. For example, on Sept. 11, the moment the event took place, Internet and TV followed right away.That's just what technology has brought us. To follow is its limitation in reporting news. No newspaper can present all aspects of our life, for each serves a different goal. That means we have to consult different newspapers to meet our different needs.Compared with other ways of media, computer, for instance,through which we can get everything we want to know with only a little tapping of our fingers, is superior. Quite on the contrary, others hold the opinion that even with the development of science and technology, newspaper, as symbol of the traditional media, won't disappear, for some of its advantages can't be replaced. First of all, it's convenient to carry about wherever you are. Newspapers can be easily packed in your suitcase, and can be bought everywhere. How to imagine carrying a computer, only for several pieces of news? Second,newspapers offer a free choice for its readers. Having a news paper, you can select what you do or do not want to read while TV or radio or even computer will probably confine your eyes to those that you regard as rubbish. Last, newspapers offer comments. Generally speaking, newspapers, especially formal ones,include formal remarks on the important events that provide you with a better understanding. Concerning those two opposed opinions, I support the latter. Though the highly developed science and technology influence almost every corner of the world and quicken the pace of globalization which makes the idea of "sharing the source" come true, newspaper, as the traditional way of media, cannot be abolished, not only because of its irreplaceable advantages but its collectability and its inner charm of witnessing the good old days. The form changes, but the spirit never.。

3.求英文辩论赛总结陈词~~~~谢谢

Some people hold that the newspaper is bound to be media of the past. To start with, time plays the most important role.As is shown, what has been in the newspaper is outdated. That is to say, if we want to approach the latest news, newspaper is simply not a good way. For example, on Sept. 11, the moment the event took place, Internet and TV followed right away.That's just what technology has brought us. To follow is its limitation in reporting news. No newspaper can present all aspects of our life, for each serves a different goal. That means we have to consult different newspapers to meet our different needs.Compared with other ways of media, computer, for instance,through which we can get everything we want to know with only a little tapping of our fingers, is superior. Quite on the contrary, others hold the opinion that even with the development of science and technology, newspaper, as symbol of the traditional media, won't disappear, for some of its advantages can't be replaced. First of all, it's convenient to carry about wherever you are. Newspapers can be easily packed in your suitcase, and can be bought everywhere. How to imagine carrying a computer, only for several pieces of news? Second,newspapers offer a free choice for its readers. Having a news paper, you can select what you do or do not want to read while TV or radio or even computer will probably confine your eyes to those that you regard as rubbish. Last, newspapers offer comments. Generally speaking, newspapers, especially formal ones,include formal remarks on the important events that provide you with a better understanding. Concerning those two opposed opinions, I support the latter. Though the highly developed science and technology influence almost every corner of the world and quicken the pace of globalization which makes the idea of "sharing the source" come true, newspaper, as the traditional way of media, cannot be abolished, not only because of its irreplaceable advantages but its collectability and its inner charm of witnessing the good old days. The form changes, but the spirit never.。

4.求英语辩论总结陈词 急用谢谢

唉，怎么是正方呢？看一下有没有吧：祝成功

According to all the ridiculous hype surrounding Dec. 21, 2012, the Mayans "predicted" the end of the world with one of their calendars. On this date, doomsayers assert that Earth will be ravaged by a smorgasbord of cataclysmic astronomical events -- everything from a Planet X flyby to a "killer" solar flare to a geomagnetic reversal, ensuring we have a very, very bad day.

Now, purely as a consequence of the Long Count's numerical value, many Mayan scholars agree that the calendar will "run out" after 5,126 years (or, at least, it's first cycle does). The Mayans set this calendar to begin in the year 3114 B.C. (according to our modern Gregorian calendar). If the Long Count began in 3114 B.C. and it's calculated to continue for 5126 years, the "end date" will be -- you guessed it -- 2012 A.D. Further refinement sets the date to Dec. 21, the day of the winter solstice for the Northern Hemisphere.

5.求一份英文辩论赛四辩总结陈词

For more than 1,500 years men have been disputing over the subject of the sinful nature of man. Some call it the carnal nature, some call it the Adamic nature, some call it “inherited sin,” and others refer to it by other names. We have headed this article with the words, “Native Depravity.”Let us consider what it is, how the family of man came to have it, and what God did to make it possible for us to rid ourselves of it. We are told by the Apostle John that sin is the transgression of the law (John 3:4).We are told by Paul that the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). We are also told that where there is no law there is no sin (Romans 5:13). So imputed sin involves our will. We knowingly DO WRONG, or we knowingly refuse TO DO that which we know we should when we commit an imputed sin. For such a sin the only one held accountable is the person who commits the act. God said that the father would not die for the sin of the son and the son would not die for the sin of the father (Ezekiel 18:20). However, we must admit, families do suffer many things from the sins of the father, or the son. Whole families suffer because one member does some evil deed.Now the family of man, as yet unborn, could not be held accountable for the sin of Adam and Eve. God told them that in the day they ate of the forbidden fruit they would die. And, die they did! Cain and Abel were not responsible for that sinful act of their parents, yet it did have an effect on them and the entire human race.In I Corinthians 15:22 we read,“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.”Adam's sin did have an effect on others, for “in Adam all die.”Notice this verse in Romans 5:12,“Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.”Why do all men sin? (One man has answered this question by saying that all sin because they are born of the flesh, but the Bible clearly teaches that sin is not in the flesh, that it is not the flesh that sins.“Every sin that a man doeth is without the body.”It is not the flesh that sins but the soul or spirit. This man goes on to say that Adam sinned because “he had no grace,” “no strength.” In other words, he is saying that God gave Adam a command he could not possibly keep, and God did not give him grace to obey, though he was told he would die if he did not obey! How could God give such a command and put the penalty of death for disobedience on it when He would not give grace to obey?Is God unreasonable? Of course not!) Why did “death pass upon all men”? Further, we are told “death reigned from Adam to Moses” (Romans 5:14). Why? Why did God destroy the people of the earth with a flood? “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually” (Genesis 6:5). Why was this so? If Adam's sin had no effect on the people that followed, why were they not righteous people?Some who have departed from the truth say we are teaching the doctrine of Augustine when we teach native depravity, or that the tendency toward sin is passed down from generation to generation, but those who say such must not know what Augustine taught. According to D. O. Teasley in his book, The Double Cure, “Augustine in 412 maintained that men inherited not only inborn corruption, but guilt; that he was helpless.” I have never heard a Church of God minister preach that we were guilty of Adam's sin.It appears that those who are now advancing the idea that a person is not born with a depraved nature are following Pelagius, a British monk, who in 405, advanced the idea that “man inherited nothing from Adam, neither original guilt, which was impossible, nor innate corruption. 。

Every man was born free and unbiased.”Let us understand clearly that when we teach native depravity, the bent toward sin, we are not teaching that a person is guilty of some sinful act that someone else has committed; everyone must bear the responsibility of his own sins before a just God. What we are saying is that when Adam sinned and then fathered children, the bent toward sin was passed on to them. Satan won the right to plant in each new soul certain weaknesses.The effects of iniquity are passed down to the third and fourth generation. Righteousness is passed down to many generations. Thus declares the Word of God.One man used hundreds and hundreds of words to try to show there was only one kind of sin and that a child was born without what some call the sinful nature, then near the end of his mess。

6.求一份英文辩论赛四辩总结陈词

For more than 1,500 years men have been disputing over the subject of the sinful nature of man. Some call it the carnal nature, some call it the Adamic nature, some call it “inherited sin,” and others refer to it by other names. We have headed this article with the words, “Native Depravity.”Let us consider what it is, how the family of man came to have it, and what God did to make it possible for us to rid ourselves of it. We are told by the Apostle John that sin is the transgression of the law (John 3:4).We are told by Paul that the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). We are also told that where there is no law there is no sin (Romans 5:13). So imputed sin involves our will. We knowingly DO WRONG, or we knowingly refuse TO DO that which we know we should when we commit an imputed sin. For such a sin the only one held accountable is the person who commits the act. God said that the father would not die for the sin of the son and the son would not die for the sin of the father (Ezekiel 18:20). However, we must admit, families do suffer many things from the sins of the father, or the son. Whole families suffer because one member does some evil deed.Now the family of man, as yet unborn, could not be held accountable for the sin of Adam and Eve. God told them that in the day they ate of the forbidden fruit they would die. And, die they did! Cain and Abel were not responsible for that sinful act of their parents, yet it did have an effect on them and the entire human race.In I Corinthians 15:22 we read,“For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.”Adam's sin did have an effect on others, for “in Adam all die.”Notice this verse in Romans 5:12,“Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.”Why do all men sin? (One man has answered this question by saying that all sin because they are born of the flesh, but the Bible clearly teaches that sin is not in the flesh, that it is not the flesh that sins.“Every sin that a man doeth is without the body.”It is not the flesh that sins but the soul or spirit. This man goes on to say that Adam sinned because “he had no grace,” “no strength.” In other words, he is saying that God gave Adam a command he could not possibly keep, and God did not give him grace to obey, though he was told he would die if he did not obey! How could God give such a command and put the penalty of death for disobedience on it when He would not give grace to obey?Is God unreasonable? Of course not!) Why did “death pass upon all men”? Further, we are told “death reigned from Adam to Moses” (Romans 5:14). Why? Why did God destroy the people of the earth with a flood? “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually” (Genesis 6:5). Why was this so? If Adam's sin had no effect on the people that followed, why were they not righteous people?Some who have departed from the truth say we are teaching the doctrine of Augustine when we teach native depravity, or that the tendency toward sin is passed down from generation to generation, but those who say such must not know what Augustine taught. According to D. O. Teasley in his book, The Double Cure, “Augustine in 412 maintained that men inherited not only inborn corruption, but guilt; that he was helpless.” I have never heard a Church of God minister preach that we were guilty of Adam's sin.It appears that those who are now advancing the idea that a person is not born with a depraved nature are following Pelagius, a British monk, who in 405, advanced the idea that “man inherited nothing from Adam, neither original guilt, which was impossible, nor innate corruption. 。

Every man was born free and unbiased.”Let us understand clearly that when we teach native depravity, the bent toward sin, we are not teaching that a person is guilty of some sinful act that someone else has committed; everyone must bear the responsibility of his own sins before a just God. What we are saying is that when Adam sinned and then fathered children, the bent toward sin was passed on to them. Satan won the right to plant in each new soul certain weaknesses.The effects of iniquity are passed down to the third and fourth generation. Righteousness is passed down to many generations. Thus declares the Word of God.One man used hundreds and hundreds of words to try to show there was only one kind of sin and that a child was born without what some call the sinful nature, then near the end of his 。