2015430雅思作文范文

雅思大作文

讲交通问题的：The progress of transport industry is inevitable and undeniable.What is under controversy is whether the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate.To be frank,I am in high favor that we are well aware of the traffic problem.In my point of view,a possible cause of the problem is that we lack the infrastructure construction.Also the overpopulation is the cause of this problem,especially in China.Although the growth of the transport is rapid,it still can not meet the increasing needs of people.Furthermore,people abuse the private cars to take public transport instead,which caused more cars put into use.Lastly,individuals are also responsible for this problem.People are lacking in consciousness and awareness for traffic situation in order.Sometimes,people drive after drinking,which causes more traffic accidents.The solution,I think,is for government to inject more funds into the construction of infrastructure,increase more construction,such as the restructuring of metro system,elevated ways,Pearl line,and superhighway.Also government should levy heavy tax on luxurious products,and encourage people to use bus service instead of private cars.To individuals,we may establish the family planning to control the growth of the population.Furthermore,we should publicize the importance of obeying the traffic regulations among people by education,and form the civil health lifestyle.To conclude,with the joint effort of people and governments,I am sure the traffic problems will be improved.只是范文，请勿照抄，楼主可以根据上文修改出自己的东西.考试顺利哟~！。

【第一次写雅思作文,Withthegrowingconcernsonchildren

语法建议：are living a more stressful life 改为 lead a more stressful lifeamong the society 改为 within the society第一段最后句：Id rather believe that the contemporary children have less stress compare to that of the past.Admittedly 改成 It is undoubtedly,that。

文章建议：第二段不应该写现在小孩面临的压力，最好把第三段的内容放在第二段，在阐明了观点后马上就把你最有利的论点提出来，这样才能让人感觉到你的立场.其次，论点中学习压力提到的次数太多，使得文章偏离了中心，然后结尾并没有再次强调你的论点，这样的文章很缺乏说服力.文章中还有些语法错误就不一一指出了，如有问题可在百度HI 上M我，希望对LZ有帮助。

雅思大作文写几个观点？doyouagreeordisagree的题目可不可以只写

do you agree or disagree的雅思作文题目，最好是要有一个让步观点.对于每一个观点段落，可以在该段的开头就写明一个主题句，清晰的阐明该段大意，当然也可以在结尾的时候写一个总结句，一个点明段落大意的主题句或者总结句可以为作文加分.discuss both views and give your own opinoin的题目，每个view段落里面写几个分论点是可以根据自己进行调整的，如果把分论点都写在一个段落里面太长的话，可以通过自然的连接词换一段写，这些连接词类似于：however、then、so等等.是要先表明观点，表明观点，不需要像前面两段那样复杂的论证，但是也要做一个简单的说明.cause and effect的题目，每一段写一个观点即可，如果观点过多，可以适当将两个观点作为一个段落来写.有时间多到“雅思救星”上面看看，多练习、多看范文，对提高自己的雅思写作能力也是非常有帮助的.。

【请雅思高手帮忙评价我的这篇雅思作文！Topic:

When he comes across an incident,what he needs is (to) make his decision whether or not it is worth reporting and how to report it.Here comes to the second place,one of the basic obligations of a reporter is objective.（这句写的不好，问题问的是QUALITY你这里写OBLIGATION是问具有什么品质而不是有什么义务，而且最后的OBJECTIVE前应该加个TO BE）Lastly,for journalists,the first time is also indispensable.这句太CHINGLISH了，外国人根本看不懂，估计你的意思是要第一时间进行报道，改成THE ABILITY TO RESPOND to （反应能力），然后后面写两三句进行解释.这篇文章存在一些主谓不一致，字数是够的，分段也比较清晰，但感觉连词和大词用得还不够，我给分的话，大概6分，考官心情好6.5分也是有可能的.（PS：我总分8分）。

【求一篇雅思作文范文或者思路.09.12.5日考的一篇Nowadays,

我是世纪雅思学生，我问我们老师，一下是我的老师给回答的：In present-day society,plastic containers and utensils are extensively used in big cities and the countryside alike.They are so common-place and I would hazard the guess that each one of us has seen,at one time or another,the unsightly scene of plastic bags swirling in the wind.These plastic shopping bags,chopsticks,to-go boxes and mineral-water bottles,to name but a few,when not properly disposed of,create a colossal amount of non-biodegradable refuse.Therefore,some people argue that we have embarked upon a “throw-away” era when plastic rubbish is largely dumped indiscriminately and irresponsibly (this act is often labeled “white pollution” on account of the color of plastic wastes).Personally,I wholeheartedly support their view.There are numerous reasons for this worrisome phenomenon coming into being.To begin with,at present the bulk of people who shop and/or eat out regularly are still poorly-informed,uninformed or misinformed about the pernicious influence that non-biodegradable pollutants exert on the ecosystem,which is the main culprit in the global-scale mishandling of the plastic wastes.The chief component of such trash is polythene,which cannot decompose on landfill sites over the process of the next hundreds of years if no major scientific breakthrough comes along in polythene treatment.Thus,such trash must be dealt with collectively rather than be scattered like tumbleweeds.Secondly,the proliferation of plastic shopping bags and eating ware is largely fuelled by the surging,headlong consumerism.Plastic containers and utensils are lighter in weight,cheaper (often free of charge) in price and water-proof in performance.These superior properties make them preferable to their paper and cloth counterparts in customers eyes; and as consumer satisfaction reigns supreme in contemporary society,compared with superb portability,affordability and utility,how to dispose of them is the last thing the customers are concerned about.Additionally,plastic bags,wrap and containers are also commercially feasible since they are cheaper to manufacture,ship and store.These mercenary considerations also have prompted the good old cloth or paper bags to be supplanted by plastic bags but over the phasing-out process,few stores and restaurants advocate or encourage the use of environmentally-benign disposal of plastic trash,hence the whole slew of non-biodegradable garbage and environmental hazards ensue.Given the scale and severity of “white pollution”,we must take immediate steps to address this scourge.In the first place,we must do our utmost to enhance peoples awareness of how persistent and devastating non-biodegradable trash can be to our environment and our posteritys.Secondly,retail stores and dining establishments should spare no effort in encouraging their customers to reuse plastic packing items.Furthermore,indiscriminate and irresponsible dumping of household garbage or personal junk should be outlawed by the legislature and heavy fines or even jail terms must be imposed on those compulsive litterbugs who fail to get their act together.Then,on the part of the biochemical researchers and technologists,scientific research must be launched here and now in pursuit of effectual ways to convert non-biodegradable refuse to biodegradable refuse.Last but not least,the government must not shirk its obligations in mobilizing scientific resources and rallying popular support in the crusade against “white pollution”.Neither should pay just lip service to relevant research and campaigns if no enough funding can be obtained otherwise.Additionally,I am convinced a customer tax levied by the government on the use of plastic bags will also help to curb this massive “white pollution”.The havoc non-biodegradable refuse can wreak on the ecosystem is beyond our imagination.It can eventually devastate soil,water and the aquatic and terrestrial biota.We must start combating this environmental catastrophe before the ecosystem irretrievably breaks down under the reign of the minute plastic debris.要是还有需要，请和我们世纪雅思的老师沟通吧~。

雅思c7t4小作文,求范文

The charts compare the sources of electricity in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000. Between these years electricity production almost doubled, rising from 100 units to 170 in Australia, and from 90 to 180 units in France.In 1980 Australia used coal as the main electricity source (50 units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydro power (each producing 20 units) and oil (which produced only 10 units). By 2000, coal had become the fuel for more than 75% of electricity produced and only hydro continued to be another significant source supplying approximately 20%.In contrast, France used coal as a source for only 25 units of electricity in 1980, which was matched by natural gas. The remaining 40 units were produced largely from oil and nuclear power, with hydro contributing only 5 units. But by 2000 nuclear power, which was not used at all Australia, had developed into the main source, producing almost 75% of electricity, at 126 units, while coal and oil together produced only 50 units. Other sources were no longer significant.Overall, it is clear that by 2000 these two countries relied on different principal fuel sources: Australia relied on coal and France on nuclear power.。

雅思c7t4小作文,求范文

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

考官范文：

The charts compare the sources of electricity in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000. During these years electricity production almost doubled, rising from 100 units to 170 in Australia, and from 90 to 180 units in France.

In 1980 Australia used coal as the main electricity source (50 units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydro power (each producing 20 units) and oil (which produced only 10 units). By 2000, coal had become the fuel for more than 75% of electricity produced and only hydro power continued to be another significant source supplying approximately 20%.

In contrast, France used coal as a source for only 25 units of electricity in 1980, which was matched by natural gas. The remaining 40 units were produced largely from oil and nuclear power, with hydro power contributing only 5 units. But by 2000 nuclear power, which was not used at all in Australia, had developed into the main source, producing almost 75% of electricity, at 126 units, while coal and oil together produced only 50 units. Other sources were no longer significant.

Overall, it is clear that by 2000 these two countries relied on different principal fuel sources: Australia relied on coal and France on nuclear power.