12月2日雅思大作文真题：老建筑应该被拆除吗

关于老建筑物的价值及其是否该拆除，这是个绝对的老题，唐老师在雅思写作教学和讲座中曾多次以本题为例讲雅思写作的基本思路。

那么城市中的老建筑物是否应该拆除？可能有些同学会用一边倒的思维方式来思考这个题目，认为不应该拆除老建筑物，因为这些建筑物有历史和文化价值，应该保留。这个思路不错，但接下去怎么写呢？这些同学可能就开始懵圈了，因为实在很难找到保留老建筑物的其他理由了。

其实，如果打开思路，我们就会发现，对某些人来说，城市里的老建筑物是应该拆除的，因为抛开历史文化价值，这些老建筑物的确没有实用价值，它们占据着城市的有限空间，既不能居住，也不能为我们的生活提供任何便利，同时维护不好的话，还可能给居民带来危险。因此，就本题而言，我们可以开始论述应该拆除老建筑物的理由，然后再论述保留老建筑物的理由（同时回答老建筑物对我们的重要意义），最后得出结论：保留老建筑物也许并不能给我们带来实际的生活好处，但其历史和文化价值是不能忽略的。

01 Every city has old buildings. Now the question is: how to deal with these old buildings? Some people think they should be pulled downandreplaced with new ones, while others believe they should be preserved and protected.每个城市都有老建筑。现在的问题是：如何处理这些老建筑？有些人认为他们应该被推倒，用新建筑取而代之，而另一些人则认为它们应该得到保留和保护。

解析 （1）本段为引入段：本次范文的引入段比较直接，用问答开始。（2） pull down 推到 （本文还使用了remove, destroy来表达相似的意思） （3） replace 取代 （后面接by和with都可以） （4）preserve 保留 （注意区分reserve, conserve）02 There are a host ofreasons why the urban old buildings should be removed. To start with, the old buildings are no longer suitable for people to live in, therefore they should be destroyed and give way tonew buildings so that people, especially young people in the cities have more living spaces. Secondly, the old buildings can cause inconveniencesfor the city dwellers. Since there is not a direct routethrough the old buildings, people sometimes have to go to and off work by making alongdetour around them, and in this way much of their time is wasted. Finally, the old buildings may give rise tosafety problems. More than 100 people, for example, are killed or injured each year in my city, just because of the collapseof some ancient buildings.城市老建筑应该被拆除，这有众多原因。

首先，老建筑不再适合人们居住，因此，它们应该被摧毁，并让位于新建筑，这样城里的人们（尤其是年轻人）才有更多的居住空间。其次，旧建筑会给城市居民带来不便。

因为没有穿过旧建筑的直路，人们有时不得不绕过它们走很长的路去上下班，这样就浪费了他们很多时间。最后，老建筑物可能引发安全问题。

例如，在我的城市，每年有超过100人因为一些老建筑倒塌而死亡或受伤。解析（1） 本段论述老建筑物应该被拆除的三个理由：住房空间问题；行路不方便问题；安全问题。

每一论点后面都用一句话来论证。（2） a host of 众多（3） remove 移除（4） give way to 让位于。

。（5） inconvenience 不便（6） city dweller 城市居民（7） route 路线（8） make a detour 绕道而行（9） give rise to 引发（10） collapse 倒塌 （n.）03 Yet old buildings - at least some of them - are significanthistorically and culturally, and hence should be protected from being destroyed for any reason. They deserve to be well-kept and preserved because they carry some important messages about the city or the whole nation. The Summer Palace, for instance, is a perfect reminderof how the imperial family in the Qing Dynasty infeudalChina were living and hence has great cultural significance. Such old buildings, if well preserved, can become tourist spots and attract thousands of visitors from all over the world.然而，古老的建筑——至少其中一些——在历史和文化上都是重要的，因此应该保护免遭任何理由的破坏。

它们值得妥善保存和保存，因为它们携带了城市或国家的一些重要信息。比如，颐和园能很好地提醒我们，封建中国的清代皇家是如何生活的，因此具有重要的文化意义。

这些古老的建筑如果保存好，可以成为旅游景点，吸引成千上万的来自世界各地的游客。解析（1） 本段论证老建筑具有历史和文化含义，因此不能被拆除。

（2） significant 重要的（3） for any reason 为了任何理由（4） deserve 值得（5） reminder 提醒的话或物（6） imperial 帝王的（7） feudal 封建的（8） attract 吸引04 We all need a memoryof our past. Many old buildings do have historical and cultural value which tells us who we were. We need to take good care of these buildings and keep them as long as possible so that they can tell the stories of the city or the nation to the future generation. Of course, those old buildings with little value ought to be。

【求一篇雅思作文范文或者思路.09.12.5日考的一篇Nowadays,

我是世纪雅思学生，我问我们老师，一下是我的老师给回答的：In present-day society,plastic containers and utensils are extensively used in big cities and the countryside alike.They are so common-place and I would hazard the guess that each one of us has seen,at one time or another,the unsightly scene of plastic bags swirling in the wind.These plastic shopping bags,chopsticks,to-go boxes and mineral-water bottles,to name but a few,when not properly disposed of,create a colossal amount of non-biodegradable refuse.Therefore,some people argue that we have embarked upon a “throw-away” era when plastic rubbish is largely dumped indiscriminately and irresponsibly (this act is often labeled “white pollution” on account of the color of plastic wastes).Personally,I wholeheartedly support their view.There are numerous reasons for this worrisome phenomenon coming into being.To begin with,at present the bulk of people who shop and/or eat out regularly are still poorly-informed,uninformed or misinformed about the pernicious influence that non-biodegradable pollutants exert on the ecosystem,which is the main culprit in the global-scale mishandling of the plastic wastes.The chief component of such trash is polythene,which cannot decompose on landfill sites over the process of the next hundreds of years if no major scientific breakthrough comes along in polythene treatment.Thus,such trash must be dealt with collectively rather than be scattered like tumbleweeds.Secondly,the proliferation of plastic shopping bags and eating ware is largely fuelled by the surging,headlong consumerism.Plastic containers and utensils are lighter in weight,cheaper (often free of charge) in price and water-proof in performance.These superior properties make them preferable to their paper and cloth counterparts in customers' eyes; and as consumer satisfaction reigns supreme in contemporary society,compared with superb portability,affordability and utility,how to dispose of them is the last thing the customers are concerned about.Additionally,plastic bags,wrap and containers are also commercially feasible since they are cheaper to manufacture,ship and store.These mercenary considerations also have prompted the good old cloth or paper bags to be supplanted by plastic bags but over the phasing-out process,few stores and restaurants advocate or encourage the use of environmentally-benign disposal of plastic trash,hence the whole slew of non-biodegradable garbage and environmental hazards ensue.Given the scale and severity of “white pollution”,we must take immediate steps to address this scourge.In the first place,we must do our utmost to enhance people's awareness of how persistent and devastating non-biodegradable trash can be to our environment and our posterity's.Secondly,retail stores and dining establishments should spare no effort in encouraging their customers to reuse plastic packing items.Furthermore,indiscriminate and irresponsible dumping of household garbage or personal junk should be outlawed by the legislature and heavy fines or even jail terms must be imposed on those compulsive litterbugs who fail to get their act together.Then,on the part of the biochemical researchers and technologists,scientific research must be launched here and now in pursuit of effectual ways to convert non-biodegradable refuse to biodegradable refuse.Last but not least,the government must not shirk its obligations in mobilizing scientific resources and rallying popular support in the crusade against “white pollution”.Neither should pay just lip service to relevant research and campaigns if no enough funding can be obtained otherwise.Additionally,I am convinced a customer tax levied by the government on the use of plastic bags will also help to curb this massive “white pollution”.The havoc non-biodegradable refuse can wreak on the ecosystem is beyond our imagination.It can eventually devastate soil,water and the aquatic and terrestrial biota.We must start combating this environmental catastrophe before the ecosystem irretrievably breaks down under the reign of the minute plastic debris.要是还有需要，请和我们世纪雅思的老师沟通吧~。

雅思考试大作文范文：儿童教育是父母还是老师的责任

Childhood refers to the period of time in human life span between the end of infancy when the acquisition of language starts and the beginning of adolescence at about the age of 12 or 13 years old. Child education consists of the education of child personality, perceptual capability, emotional health, and the construction of a systematic knowledge fabric. At the early childhood (between 2 and 7 years old), the main responsibility of child education is of parents, while at young childhood (between 7 and 12) teachers should be responsible for child development.

At the early childhood, it is parents who tell them how to eat and what to eat, how to speak and what to say. Parents also shape their emotional and value structure. For instance, if a boy makes a mistake, his father usually teaches him what a man should be. Another responsibility of parents during this period is to educate children how to deal with others in the society. This is virtually an indispensable ingredient of primitive socialization of the children.

At the later childhood (from 7 years old to 12 when puberty begins), the main responsibility of child education is shouldered by teachers. This is easy to understand. World widely, children at this stage spend most of their time in schools interacting with teachers and other children. Teachers impart knowledge to children and influence child moral development through their speech and behavior in the routine life. Teachers also organize various sports for children, contributing to the development of child competition and cooperation.

To sum up, both parents and teachers are crucial in child education. At different time, the functions of them are different.

做剑桥雅思12套题目够吗？

你有在什么雅思培训中心学过吗？如果学过2个月左右6.5是没问题的。

还有34天考试，其实时间不算很紧，好好训练自己薄弱的环节，巩固一下就好。

听力什么听剑桥就可以了。先不要看答案和原文，听一句写一句，这个叫精听，精听是最有用的训练听力的方法，但时间控制在30分钟左右，因为时间长了就容易集中精神。

口语，你在中国考吗？去慎小嶷的博客，那里的预测很准，就对着那些问题全都准备一遍口语就算过关了。

阅读。需要不停的，天天练，少一天都不行。

写作，最好是写出自己的模板，不要背那些别人写出来的，自己创造一个。例如开头那段第一句不写总结，而是写题目的改写等等。

34天其实时间很充裕，不用担心。

PS：祝你考试顺利！！

剑桥雅思全真试题4 第一篇小作文范文

The table gives a breakdown of the different types of family who were living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

On average, 11% of all households, comprising almost two million people, were in this position. However, those consisting of only one parent or a single adult had almost double this proportion of poor people, with 21% and 19% respectively.

Couples generally tended to be better off, with lower poverty levels for couples without children (7%) than those with children (12%). It is noticeable that for both types of household with children, a higher than average proportion were living in poverty at this time.

older people were generally less likely to be poor, though once again the trend favoured elderly couples (only 4%) rather than single elderly people (6%).

Overall the table suggests that households of single asults and those with children were more likely to be living in poverty than those consisting of couples.

T0T是不是这个，，累死我了